In the last blog, we
discussed why an organization would be necessary when we already have the
markets that are efficient. In today's blog we look at interesting reason why
organizations have a hierarchy - stated differently this approach by
Alchian-Demsetz approaches the reason for firm's existence to be measurement
and metering the problems.
The measuring problem
emerges when we talk about 'team production'; where the underlying motivation
is the production gains that occurs through cooperation amongst the people when
executing a complex task. There exists an incentive to cooperate. It is always
a possibility that there could some Shirking amongst team members and when this
happens the incentive to cooperate reduces. Shirking could range from cheating
to merely giving less than one's efforts.
The team production
in such a scenario makes it difficult to assess the contribution of individual
member - the means to monitor or measure do not enable rewarding based on
individual productivity. This imperfect connectivity to the reward system could
potentially get the members to work less diligently. Measures like, splitting
the income generated equally amongst the members doesn’t eliminate the
incentive to shirk. (This view might not strictly hold in the J-Form
organization we discussed earlier; this again would have to be understood in
the context of the society)
Such a shirking
behavior would potentially prevent a high-output individual to join the team;
or if s/he joins the team, they may become shirkers too!
In such a scenario it
would become essential to monitor the team. Monitoring each individual would
reduce the likelihood of shirking. This introduces a hierarchy of sorts for the
first time. This doesn’t completely eliminate the hierarchy and there might be
a need to monitor this monitor and so on. A strong case for this monitoring
hierarchy with reduced chances of shirking emerges when the monitor is given
the right to negotiate contracts with all the team members, monitor their productive efforts and
(crucially) claim any residual value created by the team has received their
expected compensation. The final level of this monitoring would rest at the
stockholders of the company - who could gain from the firm's residual profit.
No comments:
Post a Comment